Claim Results
What Happened
A single-family ranch home in Spring Hill, FL — located in Hernando County, one of Florida’s most sinkhole-prone regions — began showing signs of structural distress. The homeowner noticed diagonal cracks in exterior block walls, interior drywall cracking in multiple rooms, and doors and windows that no longer opened or closed properly. Floor tile in the kitchen had cracked along a line running the width of the room, and a visible slope had developed in the hallway floor.
The homeowner filed a claim with their carrier. The carrier dispatched an adjuster who documented the visible cracks and produced an estimate of $22,000 — covering only cosmetic drywall patching, repainting, and tile replacement. The carrier classified the damage as “normal settling” and did not authorize any subsurface testing or structural engineering evaluation.
What the Carrier Tried
The carrier’s strategy was to classify the damage as “settling” rather than sinkhole activity. By doing so, they avoided triggering the sinkhole provisions of the policy and limited their exposure to cosmetic surface repairs. Their adjuster did not commission Ground Penetrating Radar, geotechnical boring, or any subsurface investigation. They relied solely on a visual inspection to conclude that the structural indicators were age-related rather than caused by active subsurface conditions.
What Care Claims Did
The homeowner engaged Care Claims after receiving the $22,000 estimate. Our licensed adjusters inspected the property and immediately identified damage patterns inconsistent with normal settling: asymmetric foundation movement, stair-step cracking in block walls following a consistent directional pattern, and differential floor elevation changes measurable with a laser level.
We engaged a licensed professional geologist and a geotechnical engineering firm to conduct comprehensive subsurface testing. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) was deployed across the property footprint and surrounding yard, revealing subsurface anomalies consistent with soil voids and disturbed limestone beneath the northwest corner of the foundation.
Geotechnical boring with standard penetration testing was performed at multiple locations around the home. The borings confirmed the presence of raveled soils and void spaces in the limestone layer beneath the foundation — conditions consistent with active sinkhole activity, not normal consolidation or settling. The geological report classified the condition as sinkhole activity per the definitions in Florida Statute 627.706.
We also commissioned an independent structural engineering report documenting the full scope of structural damage: foundation deflection measurements, wall crack mapping, door and window frame distortion measurements, and floor elevation surveys. The structural engineer confirmed that the damage pattern was consistent with differential foundation movement caused by subsurface soil loss — not uniform age-related settling.
We submitted a comprehensive supplemental claim with the geological report, GPR data, boring logs, structural engineering assessment, and a remediation plan that included underpinning, grouting, and structural repair. When the carrier’s desk reviewer disputed our findings, we invoked the appraisal clause. The independent umpire reviewed the geotechnical evidence and settled the claim at $187,400, covering foundation stabilization, structural repair, and interior restoration.
Timeline
Day 1 — Engagement & Structural Assessment
Homeowner signed Letter of Representation. Care Claims performed structural damage survey with laser level measurements, crack mapping, and photographic documentation.
Days 5-18 — Geotechnical Investigation
Ground Penetrating Radar deployed across property. Geotechnical boring at multiple locations. Licensed geologist and structural engineer reports commissioned.
Day 28 — Reports Completed & Supplemental Filed
Geological report confirmed active sinkhole per FL Statute 627.706. Comprehensive supplemental claim filed with all testing data and remediation plan.
Day 50 — Carrier Dispute & Appraisal Invoked
Carrier disputed sinkhole classification and maintained “settling” position. Care Claims invoked appraisal clause per policy terms.
Day 94 — Settlement Reached
Independent umpire reviewed geotechnical evidence and ruled in favor of sinkhole coverage. Final settlement: $187,400 — covering foundation stabilization, structural repair, and interior restoration.